An Act of War: CIA Leak Gives “Incontrovertible Evidence” That 9/11 Was State Sponsored


If you have ever questioned the official narrative for the September 11th attacks then you have, without a doubt, been dubbed a conspiracy nut by the establishment media and those who hang on their every word.

Like the Warren Commission report on the JFK assassination, the 9/11 Report assembled by a Congressional investigation is unraveling and being revealed for what it really is – nothing more than a cover story.

This is no longer a conspiracy theory… it’s conspiracy fact.

After the 9/11 attacks, the public was told al Qaeda acted alone, with no state sponsors.

But the White House never let it see an entire section of Congress’ investigative report on 9/11 dealing with “specific sources of foreign support” for the 19 hijackers, 15 of whom were Saudi nationals.

It was kept secret and remains so today.

President Bush inexplicably censored 28 full pages of the 800-page report. Text isn’t just blacked-out here and there in this critical-yet-missing middle section. The pages are completely blank, except for dotted lines where an estimated 7,200 words once stood

A pair of lawmakers who recently read the redacted portion say they are “absolutely shocked” at the level of foreign state involvement in the attacks.

Some information already has leaked from the classified section, which is based on both CIA and FBI documents, and it points back to Saudi Arabia, a presumed ally.

The Saudis deny any role in 9/11, but the CIA in one memo reportedly found “incontrovertible evidence” that Saudi government officials — not just wealthy Saudi hardliners, but high-level diplomats and intelligence officers employed by the kingdom — helped the hijackers both financially and logistically. The intelligence files cited in the report directly implicate the Saudi embassy in Washington and consulate in Los Angeles in the attacks, making 9/11 not just an act of terrorism, but an act of war.

The New York Post investigation reveals that Saudi agents, officials and operatives in Virginia, Florida, California and D.C. provided direct support by way funding or intelligence to those involved in bringing down the towers.

Karl Denninger at the Market Ticker succinctly argues that this was, in fact, an act of war:

It’s obvious given what happened, the logistical and funding requirements and where the hijackers came from along with inexplicable actions immediately following the attacks – unless our government explicitly let certain people flee.

Yet we went to war in Iraq and Afghanistan while helping the Saudis — the very people who attacked us.

And Obama, to this day, kisses the Saudi King.

Over three thousands Americans are dead – yet President Obama bows to Saudi King Abdullah, whose government had direct ties to 9/11 hijackers:

It makes a very convincing case that the Saudi Government was involved in an act of war against the United States.  Not simply terrorism — remember, the Pentagon, a military target, was one of the locations hit.  The other intended target for the plane that went down in PA was the Capitol.

You awake yet America?

You damn well should be.

It’s about damn time that the mainstream media started talking about this — you’re only a decade late, *******s.  And no, people like myself who have been saying this all along are not nuts.  

We’re right.

In addition to this startling, yet unsurprising, revelation is even more evidence that those within the Saudi government knew what was coming. Somebody made a ton of money shorting airline stocks by positioning themselves for stock prices to crash in the aftermath of 9/11 and according to Infowars, that may well have been the Chief of Saudi Intelligence and other government officials. Moreover, after all flights within the continental United States were grounded there was one – just one – airplane that was allowed to fly over U.S. soil to, you guessed it, Saudi Arabia. On board that plane were – and this has been confirmed by an official Freedom of Information request – the members of Osama Bin Laden’s extended family.

And these are but a few of the hundreds of inconsistencies surrounding the September 11th, 2001 attacks.

As it turns out, the “conspiracy theorists” are the ones who accurately detailed the series of events and those involved in the attacks. The “official story” itself, it seems, is the “conspiracy theory.”

They’ve spent hundreds of billions of dollars on securing the United States and preventing another act of terror on U.S. soil. They’ve turned their massive surveillance infrastructure inwards on the American people under the pretext of preserving our safety. They’ve identified hundreds of thousands of Americans and included them on watch lists that restrict their travel or flag them as potential threats to national security.

Yet the real threat, the one that has been validated by scores of reports and investigations, is being redacted and ignored by our government.

We know that there is more to 9/11 than the official story.

It doesn’t just involve the Saudis. America’s air defense, for example, were seemingly disarmed minutes before the attack occurred. Moreover, intelligence agents from Israel were reportedly spotted in New York on the day of, arrested by NYPD, and then released under suspicious circumstances.

All of this is highly suspect, especially that a mainstream news source like the New York Post would start releasing these details to the general public. As with 9/11, most people couldn’t make sense of it or why. A decade on we have a better perspective because we’ve seen the implementation of initiatives all across America as a result of what happened that day.

Call it a conspiracy, call it whatever you like, but look around.

If they lied – yes, lied – about the assassination of a President of the United States, or about Benghazi, or Fast and Furious, or the benefits of new health care laws, then what else are they hiding from us?

How much do you trust your government?

How much do you trust the official narrative peddled by the establishment?

How much do you trust that the powers that be have our best interests at heart?

SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don’t Say We Didn’t Warn You

A Psalm for 9/11: The Dreams That Fly Away

All mankind will pass before You

like members of the flock.

Like a shepherd pasturing his flock,

making sheep pass under his staff,

so shall You cause to pass, count, calculate, and consider the soul of all the living;

and You shall apportion the fixed needs of all Your creatures

and inscribe their verdict.

For Your Name signifies Your praise:

hard to anger and easy to appease,

for You do not wish the death of one deserving death,

but that he repent from his way and live.

Until the day of his death You await him;

if he repents You will accept him immediately.

It is true that You are their Creator and

You know their inclination,

for they are flesh and blood.

Our origin is dust and our end is dust.

At the hazard of our life we earn our bread.

We are like a fragile vessel,

like the grass that withers

the flower that fades,

the shadow that passes,

the cloud that vanishes,

the wind that blows,

the dust that floats,

the dreams that fly away


The dreams that fly away.

Your kingship is an eternal kingship.

Your dominion is for all generations.

Doug Ross @ Journal

INFURIATING: Senate to Vote on Air Support for Al Qaeda on 9/11

I cribbed most of that headline from Pamela Geller, who calls it a “perverse horror”:

President Obama cleared his first hurdle on Wednesday in his push for a military strike in Syria, as a key Senate panel voted to authorize the use of force… The Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted 10-7, with one senator voting present, to approve a military strike in response to a deadly chemical weapons attack last month.

The Senate now plans to return early from recess and meet Friday to file the resolution, setting up a key test vote in the full chamber as early as next Wednesday [9/11].

Josh Rogin reports that Harry Reid and Democrats in the Senate are violating the rules to cover for Obama’s embarrassing ‘red line’ gaffe.

Senate Democratic leadership tossed aside the rules for moving legislation with regard to the resolution authorizing the use of military force against Syria, angering some Republicans and creating confusion on Capitol Hill in the run-up to the war vote … some GOP Senate offices are upset with what they see as a rush by Democratic leadership to pass the war authorization outside the rules that govern how legislation goes through the committee process.

This is a rush to war behind closed doors,” one senior GOP Senate aide said. “We were told there was a need to have a thoughtful and public debate about how this nation goes to war, but this seems to be about simply getting a resolution done to cover the president.”

A rush to war to “cover [for] the president”?

A rush to war to support Al Qaeda on, of all dates, 9/11?

And what are John Boehner and Eric Cantor doing? Well, like clockwork they continue to ignore the will of the people — who oppose Syrian intervention by overwhelming margins — to help cover for a failed president.

Meanwhile, where does the House stand with the NSA Scandal, the Benghazi investigation, the IRS Scandal, the investigation into DOJ wiretapping of reporters and their families?

Meanwhile, where does the House stand with defunding Obamacare, the Continuing Resolution, or the Debt Ceiling debacles that face us in mere weeks?

Meanwhile, what was Boehner’s priority prior to the Syrian diversion? Amnesty for illegal immigrants.

Michael Walsh is right: we have a “partisan fusion party.”

And no one in Washington represents “we, the people” any longer.

Hat tip: BadBlue News. Artwork: MattrosArt

Doug Ross @ Journal


Guest post by Watchdog Wire


On September 11, 2013 it will have been one year since the tragic attack on the US Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi, Libya. The attack claimed the lives of Ambassador Chris Stephens and three other American citizens – marking the first time an Ambassador has been killed in action since the Carter Administration. It seems unbelievable that, almost 365 days later, American citizens are still waiting for information, answers, and justice. Only four people were ever disciplined for their actions surrounding the attack and not a single person lost their job. And Secretary of State John Kerry recently returned all four officials to work, without subjecting them to hearings regarding their role in the attack. Apparently, answers on Benghazi aren’t at the top of Kerry’s “to-do” list.

Will anyone be held accountable for this giant security failure? Have we learned anything from the ongoing investigation of the attack? The families of the victims deserve answers and American citizens deserve an explanation.


This September, join us in telling the Obama Administration that we haven’t forgotten. Contact the major players in the Benghazi incident and tell them we’re still watching and waiting for the TRUTH. Demand an update in the ongoing investigation!

As Citizen Watchdogs, it is our job to hold elected officials accountable. To help you, we have compiled a comprehensive list of the key players in Benghazi. We encourage you to reach out to these people with your questions. If you need any help, please don’t hesitate to contact us at It’s time for Washington to come clean about what really happened at Benghazi.


*Don’t forget to use #BenghaziWatch when you tweet at member of the Administration.

Who are they: President Obama

Why you care: President of the United States during Benghazi attack.

How to contact:: @BarackObama @whitehouse, Email:

Who are they: Ex-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

Why you care: Secretary of State at time of Benghazi attack. She assumed some responsibility for attack, and testified before Congress in January

How to contact: @HillaryClinton, Email:

Who are they: Secretary of State John Kerry

Why you care: Returned all “disciplined” employees back to work. Took fired officer off administrative leave.

How to contact: @StateDept, @JohnKerry

Who they are: Secretary of Defense Charles Hagel

How to contact: @DeptofDefense

Who are they: National Security Advisor Susan Rice

Why you care: Rice appeared on 5 Sunday talk shows in the aftermath of the attack, reading inaccurate talking points devoid of references to al-Qaeda or terrorism and blaming the “Innocence of Muslims” film. She testified before Congress in a closed session in November.

How to contact: @AmbassadorRice, Email:

Who they are: James Comey, Incoming FBI Director

Why you care: Comey is conducting an ongoing investigation of the Benghazi incident. He helped scrub terrorism references from Rice’s talking points.

How to contact: @FBIPressOffice

Who they are: Jay Carney, White House Press Secretary

How to contact: @PressSecretary

Who they are: Eric Holder, Attorney General

Why you care: Holder filed first charges related to attack this month.

How to contact: @TheJusticeDept, Email:

Who they are: Office of the Director of National Intelligence (James Clapper)

Why you care: “Mistakenly” cut out terrorism references from Rice talking points following the attack in Benghazi.

How to contact: @ODNIgov, Phone #: 703 733 8600

Who they are: Gen. Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs

Why you care: Dempsey testified before Congress in February. He only spoke to Obama once on 9/11/12, but has defended lack of military support for consulate.

How to contact: @Martin_Dempsey, Address: 9999 Joint Staff Pentagon, Washington, DC 20318


*Don’t forget to use #BenghaziWatch when you tweet with questions.

Who are they: Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), and Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH)

Why you care: These three Senators have taken the lead on the Benghazi investigation and have been the most vocal. Together, they formed a temporary committee to investigate the attack.

How to contact:

@SenJohnMcCain, (202) 228 2862

@GrahamBlog, @LindseyGrahamSC, (202) 224 5972

@KellyAyotte, @AyotteNH, (202) 224 4952


*Don’t forget to use #BenghaziWatch when you tweet at these elected officials.

Who are they : Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA)

Why you care: Issa is the Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. He Recently subpoenaed State Department docs, held hearings in May.

How to contact: @darrellissa, @CongressmanIssa, @GOPOversight, (202) 225 3906

Who are they: Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD)

Why you care: Cummings is a ranking Democrat on the Oversight Committee.

How to contact: @OversightDems, @ElijahCummings, (202) 225 4741

Who are they: Rep. Buck McKeon (R-CA)

Why you care: McKeon is Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee

How to contact: @BuckMcKeon, (202) 225 1956

Who are they: Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA)

Why you care: Smith is a ranking Democrat on Armed Services. He Called the Benghazi investigation a “witch hunt.”

How to contact: @Rep_Adam_Smith, @HASCDemocrats, (202) 225 8901

Who are they: Rep. Martha Roby (R-AL)

Why you care: Roby is Chairwoman of the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. She heard classified testimony last month from Col. George Bristol on the attack.

How to contact: @RepMarthaRoby, @TeamRoby, (202) 225 2901

Who are they: Rep. Ed Royce (R-CA)

Why you care: Royce is Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. He held hearings in January and July to examine State Department accountability.

How to contact: @RepEdRoyce, (202) 225 4111

Who are they: Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY)

Why you care: Engel is ranking Democrat on Foreign Affairs. He has vociferously defended Clinton’s actions.

How to contact: @RepEliotEngel, (202) 225 2464

Who are they: Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI)

Why you care: Rogers is Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. He is conducting an ongoing investigation and has held 8 hearings on Benghazi.

How to contact: @RepMikeRogers, (202) 225 4872

Who are they: Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD)

Why you care: Ruppersberger is ranking Democrat on Intelligence. He defended Petraeus’ role, and later become one of first Dems to admit that Rice’s talking points were wrong.

How to contact: @Call_Me_Dutch, (202) 225 3061

Who are they: Rep. Pete King (R-NY)

Why you care: King is Chairman of the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence. He has been one of the most vocal critics of the administration on Benghazi.

How to contact: @RepPeteKing, (202) 225 7896

Who they are: Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC), Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI)

Why you care: These four sent a letter, along with the Three Amigos and Issa, to FBI Director Comey last month.

How to contact:

@TGowdySC, (202) 225 6030

@Jim_Jordan, (202) 225 2676

@jasoninthehouse, (202) 225 7751

@SenRonJohnson, @Ron4Senate, (202) 224 5323

Who they are: Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI)

Why you care: Levin is the Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. He held hearings on Benghazi in February.

How to contact: @SenCarlLevin, (202) 224 6221

Who they are: Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK)

Why you care: Inhofe is ranking Republican on Armed Services. He has suggested Obama could be impeached over cover-up.

How to contact: @InhofePress, @jiminhofe, (202) 224 4721

Who they are: Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ)

Why you care: As Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Menendez held a hearing on Benghazi in January and heard Hillary Clinton’s testimony.

How to contact: @SenatorMenendez, @Menendez4NJ, (202) 224 4744

Who are they: Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN)

Why you care: Corker is ranking Republican on Foreign Relations. He has been one of the most aggressive Republicans in criticizing the administration’s response to Benghazi.

How to contact: @SenBobCorker, (202) 224 3344

Who are they: Sen. Tom Carper (D-DE)

Why you care: Carper is Chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. His committee published a report in December faulting the State Department for failing to respond to security threats.

How to contact: @SenatorCarper, (202) 224 2441

Who are they: Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK)

Why you care: Ranking Republican on Homeland Security, Coburn accused the State Department of “glaring omissions” in the Benghazi documents it turned over.

How to contact: @TomCoburn, (202) 224 5754

Who are they: Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)

Why you care: Feinstein is Chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. The White House has given her committee its emails relating to Benghazi.

How to contact: @SenFeinstein, (202) 224 3841

Who are they: Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA)

Why you care: Ranking Republican on Intelligence, Saxby wants the White House’s emails on Benghazi to be declassified and made public.

How to contact: @SaxbyChambliss, (202) 224 3521

Who are they: Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC)

Why you care: Burr is the second-ranking Republican on Intelligence. He accused the CIA of refusing to give his committee intel on Benghazi.

How to contact: @SenatorBurr, (202) 224 3154


*Don’t forget to use #BenghaziWatch when you tweet at these members of the media.

When you’re done pressuring politicos, don’t forget to give a shout out to those few who have watched the investigation closely. Here at Watchdog Wire, we can be skeptical and even critical of the traditional media, but many MSM reporters have earned our respect pushing for answers regarding Benghazi. Take a moment and thank them for their continued coverage of the attack and dedication to informing the American public. These journalists are rock stars!

Who are they: The Quilliam Foundation

Why you care: The Quilliam Foundation is a counter-extremism group based in UK. They were the first to debunk the story that the Benghazi attack was related to “Innocence of Muslims” film and prove link to al-Qaeda.

How to contact: @QuilliamF,

Who they are: SITE Intelligence Group

Why you care: SITE (Search for International Terrorist Entities) is the terrorism research group that reported 4 days after the attack that it was in retaliation for the killing of al-Qaeda #2 al-Libi.

How to contact: @siteintelgroup,, (301) 841 7740

Who they are: Foreign Policy Magazine

Why you care: In November, Foreign Policy Magazine published documents from just before the attack in which consulate personnel expressed security concerns.

How to contact: @ForeignPolicy, (202) 728 7300

Who they are: Paula Broadwell

Why you care: Petraeus’ biographer and mistress, Broadwell revealed that the consulate’s CIA annex was used to imprison Libyan militia members.

How to contact: @paulabroadwell

Who they are: Margaret Brennan

Why you care: A CBS State Department correspondent, Brennan broke the news that DNI, CIA, and FBI had scrubbed “al-Qaeda” and “terrorism” references from Susan Rice’s talking points

How to contact: @margbrennan

Who they are: Sharyl Attkisson

Why you care: A CBS investigative reporter, Attkisson has been one of the leading journalists covering the Benghazi investigations. Her computer was mysteriously hacked.

How to contact: @SharylAttkisson

Who they are: Stephen Hayes

Why you care: The Weekly Standard reporter, has broken several Benghazi stories including details on how much scrubbing of talking points the CIA did.

How to contact: @stephenfhayes

Who they are: Ed Henry

Why you care: As Fox News Senior White House correspondent, Henry has pressed Obama and Carney on Benghazi

How to contact: @edhenryTV

Who they are: Julie Pace

Why you care: AP White House Correspondent

How to contact: @jpaceDC

Who they are: Jon Karl

Why you care: Karl is ABC News’ Chief White House Correspondent. He reported this spring on White House’s changing and scrubbing of Benghazi talking points

How to contact: @jonkarl

Who they are: Jake Tapper

Why you care: CNN anchor and Washington Correspondent, Tapper broke the story earlier this month that dozens of CIA agents were on the ground during the attack.

How to contact: @jaketapper

Who they are: Arwa Damon

Why you care: As CNN Senior International Correspondent, Damon interviewed a Benghazi suspect whom federal investigators have not spoken to about his role in the attack.

How to contact: @arwaCNN

Who they are: Drew Griffin

Why you care: A CNN Investigative Reporter, Griffin was the lead reporter for CNN on Benghazi. His access to the White House has been restricted since he started working on the story.

How to contact: @DrewGriffinCNN

Who they are: Michael Birnbaum

Why you care: Washington Post Berlin correspondent. Birnbaum reported on scattered FBI documents found at attack site.

How to contact: @michaelbirnbaum

Who they are: Andrea Mitchell

Why you care: Mitchell is NBC’s Chief Foreign Correspondent and lead reporter for NBC on Benghazi. She has accused Republicans of politicizing the investigation.

How to contact: @mitchellreports

Who they are: David D. Kirkpatrick

Why you care: Kirkpatrick is New York Times Cairo’s bureau chief. He has investigated on the ground in Libya and was the first to identify Ansar al-Shariah as the local al-Qaeda group that organized attack.

How to contact: @ddknyt

*If you know of other political players who should be added to this list, or better ways to contact them, please email us at and we will update the list. Thank you.

Doug Ross @ Journal